To Create Jobs, Industries Must Transform

by Fred Siegmund

The decline of the American Textile industry is well documented. In 1990, there were 928,000 people working in just the apparel industry; by 2008 it was down to 198,000.

The decline is more than double the jobs lost in the automobile industry.

Most of us see our clothes marked “Made in China” or some far eastern country. In the debate over free trade, economists have offered excuses, saying textiles and the cut and sew clothing industry are labor intensive and American labor is too expensive to compete with the Chinese.

News coverage on the global clothing industry often includes a picture of Asian women lined up in long rows at sewing machines suggesting another excuse: low cost needs large scale.

Large firms are common in manufacturing because manufacturing industries typically start out with many companies that gradually consolidate into a few large scale producers.

The automobile industry started out with hundreds of firms at the beginning of the last century. Gradually, they combined into fewer, but bigger producers, until only three American companies survive in a small group of global auto companies.

The cut and sew clothing industry was never like the automobile industry, but large firms produced clothing to be sold and shipped to other firms in the wholesale and retail parts of the marketing chain.

Creative Means to Be Cost Competitive

Lately, though, creative retailers are finding small scale clothing production can be cost competitive when combined with their own retail operations.

Retailers that produce on-site in their own space capture the entire marketing margin; that is the sales price above their manufacturing costs. Producing on-site eliminates the wholesaler and has the potential to cut inventory and transportation costs.

Clothing sales have seasonal fluctuations with peak sales in late summer and again in December. Staff doing cut and sew in off peak periods can be moved to retail selling in peak sales periods making more intensive use of staff and raising labor productivity and lowering costs.

Shipping charges from the Far East are eliminated with local production. Freight charges from China to Long Beach are only part of the expense to import clothing.

There are Long Beach handling charges, warehouse in and out fees, forklift fees, customs entry fees, and customs duties, but the clothing shipment is still in Long Beach. Add the shipping fee from Long Beach to wherever, and when it is all added up shipping charges are not insignificant in the costs for importing clothing.

Industries Can Transform, However Unlikely

It is unusual for an industry to transform itself from a few dominate firms to many small firms in competition. But it can happen.

For many years, IBM dominated the computer industry. Then the microprocessor chip transformed the industry allowing hundreds of new firms to enter the hardware and software industry. The PC revolution created many jobs with firms only a fraction the size of IBM.

In the combined textile and apparel industries, more than a million jobs are gone, but that should not mean it was inevitable as economists like to say. What looks inevitable may not be.

America needs jobs and new ideas; maybe a smaller scale, fully integrated clothing industry is one place to look.

About the author: Fred Siegmund covers America's jobs as part of work doing labor market analysis and projections for a client base of recruiters, trainers and counselors. Visit him at www.americanjobmarket.blogspot.com

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: